Thursday 20 October 2011

A Day With Young Lawyers of the Kuala Lumpur Bar

The KL Bar Young Lawyers Committee (YLC) have agreed to conduct workshops for BAC undergraduates. 10 volunteer lawyers will be sharing their experiences and also provide queries regarding the legal profession and other social issues. The workshop will also see the attendance of members of the KL Bar Pupils Welfare Committee who will endeavour to provide assistance and information to students about Pupillages. 

Venue: BAC2 (to be confirmed)
Time: 9am - 1pm


Please confirm your attendance with your respective class representatives if you wish to attend this workshop.

Tuesday 18 October 2011

BAC Gala Night 2011

Venue: The Prince Hotel & Residence KL
Date: 15th December 2011
Time: 7pm - 12am
Early Bird Price: RM99 per pax(until 25/Nov)
Normal Price: RM110

Note: Anyone who purchases 6 ticket or more will be allowed to choose whichever table preferred. Tickets will be available right after Deepavali break. Be sure to drop by our event page for any further information.

Wednesday 12 October 2011

Youth, Know Thy Constitution.

It was yet another cloudless sunny morning at Brickfields Asia College (BAC) but one could tell that something peculiar was up today. Having ditched their staple apparel of shorts and sandals, the students of UKT Year 1 arrived all dressed up in their smart casual attire, and rightfully so.


The MyConstitution workshop was to be held for the very first time at BAC in the air-conditioned refuge of the auditorium at level four. The main objective of the said workshop was to educate and raise awareness among the budding law students regarding the single most important document in our country. That’s right, guys; we’re talking about the Federal Constitution here.


The seminar was headed by Syah, a young lawyer and legal firm partner who was particularly cheerful despite it being nine in the morning.

The workshop kicked off with a little game where a series of supposingly controversial statements, ranging from the abolishment of the Internal Security Act (ISA) and the death penalty to allowing people from undergoing gender change, were thrown to the students. They were then given the option to either agree or disagree with the statements presented.



The students were equally divided in their stance as they made their decisions. A handful of reluctant students were called out to deliver and share their reasons as to why and how they came up with such conclusions. Their judgements appear to be either derived from the school of logical thinking or from their respective religious upbringings.


“The point of today is to think of the issue thoroughly and arrive with opinions which can be discussed and used to convince others,” said Leong, the co-conductor of the seminar, as he clarified the purpose of the previous game.

The students were then assigned into ten groups. Syah had a smirk on his face as he ensued to announce to them the first exercise of the day: reconstituting Earth 2.0.


He told us to liken the situation to the high-budget but underwhelming disaster movie, ‘2012’, where once again the only ones to survive every tsunami, earthquake and tectonic-related catastrophes are the Americans. Our goal was to pick six people out a list of twenty five candidates to lead the charge in building a new world and ensure the continuity of both mankind and humanity.


The students were given a meager time allowance of thirty minutes to come up with their respective group names and unanimously pick the six chosen ones. Voting was strictly prohibited; democracy failed to exist within the four walls of the auditorium on that fateful Thursday morning.


Each and every group was then asked to present their choices and their grounds for doing so before the audience. Students took into account the race and gender factor as they select the best six. One particular group elucidated their logic measuring the usefulness and resourcefulness of the candidates' respective skills; none of us could care less about the author of children’s books or the spiritual healer and adviser. This method of reasoning was echoed throughout most of the other groups.


Oddly enough, three groups opted for the beauty queen to be placed onboard the shuttle. These groups gave legitimate and perfectly understandable reasons concerning her superior genes, enhanced reproductivity abilities, entertainment quotient and 'certified hotness'. Yet, none of the groups were as bizarre as the sole group that decided to pick the orang Asli leader. Their rationale for doing so was due to his unrivalled skills in trekking rough and foreign terrains and the various other basic survival techniques he has acquired growing up in the jungles.


The most popular choices of the day proved to be the single mother with two children, followed by the odd-job labourer and the Indian farmer. It seems that nobody could resist the ‘get one mother, free two children’ deal. It was bad news for everyone else in the law profession though, with only one group deciding to go for the lawyer among the other candidates.


Leong noted that the main importance of the exercise was to demonstrate the significance of being able to discuss and debate conflicting opinions openly in a safe environment as opposed to immediately declaring it “Sensitive!” and shut down all subsequent discussions. The students could not agree more. Open discussion has led to better decisions and greater compromise during the aforesaid exercise.

“If anything, this exercise also shows hope in humanity; that the six people chosen will be able to get Earth 2.0 ready for a new beginning,” explained Leong. “The need of today’s programme is to show that we can agree to a basic set of values to govern the new world.”

Moving on, Syah proceeded to discuss about the necessities required to have a quality life. He then presented a simple, and perhaps primal, question to the students: what is needed for a quality life?


A myriad of opinions were given: security, happiness, food, education, peace, expression, money, healthcare, utilities, love, shelter, etc. A suggestion by a student of the fairer sex to include shopping malls onto the list drew laughter and much amusement from the crowd. Alas, this is Malaysia indeed.


Further answers include family, friends, companion, entertainment, privacy, religion, sleep, clothes and justice, nevertheless. A wise fellow student gave a mention of the internet and all across the hall, a sea of heads can be seen nodding in unison as they showcased their mutual agreement.

Though the exercise aforementioned might seem a tad juvenile at first glance, Syah explained that the criteria that made up a quality life closely relate to the core principles of human rights.

“The issues pertaining to human rights should be of concern to each and every one of us in our community, even if you are a Nasi Lemak 2.0 seller,” explained Syah, with a tongue-in-cheek reference to the recently released local movie about a man’s quest to create the ultimate Malaysian national dish.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), drafted by the United Nations in the year 1948, is the foundation of all enacted human rights articles worldwide. Its effect and influence were given explanation and put in simpler words to the students through various examples and illustrations.

“The original right, the right that began all rights, was the right to life,” said Leong, in regards to the utmost fundamental element in the issue of human liberties. “All the human rights enable you to maximize your development so that you can become the best person that you can be.”


The seminar ended on a high note with a poignant reading of the Proclamation of Independence Federation of Malaya by Leong. A food for thought, perhaps, to the students as they rose from their seats and headed towards the exit.

All in all, the MyConstitution workshop has been a success. The seminar was pulled off in a rather triumphant manner and much gratitude and appreciation was owed to the volunteers - Syah, Leong, Firdaus, Shawn, Joanne, Devan, Derek, Chris, Ian and Joachim. The event was realised through their efforts and hardwork behind the scenes.

Ignorance is certainly not bliss when our fundamental liberties are at stake, but rest assured that this is unlikely to happen as the ongoing MyConstitution campaign gathers up steam and goes from strength to strength.


Article by Nigel Lim. Photos by Ian Choong.



Nigel Lim is a UKT Year 1 student. He is normal.

Thursday 6 October 2011

Mooting Talk

There will be a talk about mooting by Mr Murali tomorrow. Everyone is welcomed to attend. 

Venue: BAC2 moot court
Date: 7th Oct(Friday)
Time: 2pm - 3pm

Wednesday 5 October 2011

Derek Kok: They Taught Me Racism?


Derek Kok reminisces his past to find out how he started to see colour.
A, C, D, E, F . . .
I went to kindergarten at Tadika Riang Baru.
I remember competing with an ‘angmoh‘ kid for the attention of an Indian girl named Joanne. You could say she was my  ‘first crush’. I adored her. I thought her pixie haircut was cute. That smile, oh that smile. Tadika Riang Baru’s uniform never looked prettier on anyone else.
I remember that my best friend in kindergarten was Luvin Kumar, a Chindian boy.  We were like Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn. Maybe Batman & Robin.
I remember a lot of things from my kindergarten days. But I also remember that I did not know a lot.
I didn’t know what was Malay, Chinese or Indian.
I didn’t know Joanne was Indian. All I knew was that oh-so-sweet smile.
I didn’t know the angmoh was an ‘angmoh‘. All I knew was that I did not appreciate him going after my girl. >:(
I didn’t know Luvin was Chindian.
I didn’t know back then that I did not ‘look Chinese’.
I remember my grandmother saying that I looked Malay. She also told me that if I misbehaved, the ‘apunehneh‘ (a not-so-nice term for Indians) will kidnap me. The apunehneh was like the Bogeyman;  an embodiment of terror which my grandmother used to great effect in order to keep my mischievous behaviour at bay.
Ke Bangku Sekolah Rendah
Then it was primary school. People say that you go to school to learn.
I did. I learnt what ‘Malay’, ‘Chinese’, ‘Indian’ meant.
My eyes started to see ‘colour’.
I even started to notice my own colour. Like my grandmother, people were remarking that I looked Malay. I remember how my mum’s colleagues in school would joyfully exclaim that I ‘looked Melayu‘. I never understood why were they grinning from ear to ear while going, “Eh macam Melayu la anak kamu ini!” (My mum was a teacher in the same school, horror of horrors).
I began to see that people were separated based on WHAT they are. I remember an ustazahcoming into my class one day, asking those who were non-Muslims to raise our hands. Being the blur kid I was, I raised my hand in compliance.
She then looked straight at me, “Kamu ni Cina ke Melayu?
Cina, cikgu.
We were then asked to leave our class to go into another. Ah, the segregation of Moral andPendidikan Islam students. I began to see that there was a “them vs us” culture right in the classrooms of a mission school.
In school, I learnt many new words. I learnt that certain words carried certain connotations with them, words that somehow like a magic spell from Harry Potter would incite mini fights in my all-boys school. Mind you, boys whose age did not even reach a double figure.
Words like keling.
Babi.
Not only that, I also learnt a few things. Cina makan babi, Cina kedekut. Malays were dumb, lazy and could not speak English. I learnt that Indians were keling; the troublemakers in school. I learnt that the Chinese and Indians are to go back to China and India respectively if we don’t know how to speak Bahasa Melayu. I learnt that the Malays were good at sepak takraw, the Indians football and running, the Chinese in maths and basketball.
I was just the teacher’s son. A primary school kid in navy blue shorts.
But I learnt a lot didn’t I?
These ‘lessons’ I learnt, were they true?
I was just the teacher’s son. A primary school kid in navy blue shorts.
How could I have known, what was right or wrong with what I ‘learnt’ in school?
People always thought I was Malay from my looks. Didn’t help that I had a Malay slang to go with my look. In fact the most FAQ I am asked is – “You Malay ah?”
Funny thing was, I represented Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur to the Bahasa Melayu National-level Storytelling Competition for two consecutive years in primary school, falling in love with the language in the process. In Year 4, I placed fourth. In Year 5, I emerged as the National Champion, possibly the first non-Malay to win that title.
Masuk Sekolah Menengah
Then came secondary school.
History repeated itself.
Everyone thought I was Malay.
There was once I nearly got punished by the afternoon session supervisor. Reason? Saya tak pergi solat. He obviously thought I was Malay.
Racism was alive and well in school. It wasn’t an abstract concept, it could be seen by anyone who has a pair of eyes. Siva would sit next to Guna in class. A bunch of Chinese boys would be yakking away in Mandarin from the back of the classroom. The few Malays in class 5 Azam would huddle together. Our class teacher would valiantly try to change our seating arrangements to reflect a more Malaysian setting, but to no avail.
When we went for sports, the Chinese kids would naturally gravitate to the basketball courts, while the Malays and Indians would square off against each other in a game of futsal. When the bell rang for recess, the whole school would be in chaos. Imagine nearly a thousand hormonal and hungry boys on growth spurts rushing for food in the canteen. When the dust has settled (literally), you’ll see again people sitting according to their ethnicity.
I was the weird one in school. Unlike the other Chinese students, I mixed around with the other races. I was usually the only Chinese student who played futsal with the Malays and Indians. Some days I sat with the Chinese. Some days, the Indians welcomed me as one of their own.
My best friend in school was Ikhwan B. Mohd Yasin. People said that we were like brothers, some thought we were a gay couple. Sometimes, teachers would ask me, “Bila nak masuk Islam, Derek?
Belajar Rajin-rajin
I thought I am/was not racist.
I have a best friend who is a Malay.
I mixed around with people of every race.
I loved Bahasa Melayu.
I liked thinking that I represented what Malaysia was really about. My ‘Malaysian’ face was even part of a winning campaign that showcased the diversity of Malaysia.
But deep inside me, prejudices and stereotypes reign.
“Typical MalayLazy, subsidy-mentality, rempit.”
Cerita pusing. No action, talk only. Indians.”
“What a selfish, kiasu Chinese. Communist.”
Sigh.
We all know all these descriptions don’t do justice. There are very hard-working Malays out there, even in my very own school. I know of many Chinese guys who are the epitome of a bum. I have seen my Indian friends standing up for what they believe in. I remember Haris Ibrahim saying that there is only one race. The human race.
As a child, I was beautifully colour-blind. I want to be blind to what I can see now.
Who do I blame for this? My parents who pass off racist comments? My grandmother who indoctrinated me with the belief that Indian men will hunt me down if I misbehave? Or do I point my accusing finger at the education system of Malaysia?
Did they teach me racism?
Or is it the man in the mirror?
Are we all actually racists, deep inside?
Tepuk dada, tanyalah selera.



Derek is a Year 1 UKT student. He found Joanne and discovered that her name is actually Joanna.